Nested rainbow

Perturbative order$\alpha^{2}$
Topologynested
Symmetry factorCounts overcounting in the perturbation series. If a diagram has internal symmetries—ways to relabel internal lines and get the same diagram back—the symmetry factor divides that out. In QED, most diagrams have S=1 because fermion arrows break the symmetry between internal lines.1.0
Divergence UV divergent IR divergent
Gauge invariant aloneNo

Contributes to

Electron propagator

Two virtual photons emitted and reabsorbed by the electron, one enclosed inside the other. Four vertices on the main fermion line with pairing $(v_1,v_4)(v_2,v_3)$: the outer photon spans the full diagram while the inner photon is contained within it.

The computational chain

From diagram to number—every step of the amplitude calculation.

Nested topology
$$v_1 \xrightarrow{\;p-k\;} v_2 \xrightarrow{\;p-k-l\;} v_3 \xrightarrow{\;p-k\;} v_4$$
The fermion line passes through four vertices in order $v_1, v_2, v_3, v_4$. The outer photon connects $v_1$ to $v_4$ and carries loop momentum $k$; the inner photon connects $v_2$ to $v_3$ and carries loop momentum $l$. The inner photon arc is entirely enclosed within the outer one — this is the defining feature of the nested (as opposed to overlapping) topology. The diagram is 1PI: cutting any single internal line does not disconnect it.
Feynman rules expression
$$-i\Sigma_{\text{nest}}(p) = (-ie)^4 \int\frac{d^dk}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{d^dl}{(2\pi)^d}\;\gamma^\mu\,\frac{\not{p}-\not{k}+m}{(p-k)^2-m^2}\,\gamma^\nu\,\frac{\not{p}-\not{k}-\not{l}+m}{(p-k-l)^2-m^2}\,\gamma_\nu\,\frac{\not{p}-\not{k}+m}{(p-k)^2-m^2}\,\gamma_\mu\;\frac{1}{k^2\,l^2}$$
Reading along the fermion line: vertex $v_1$ contributes $\gamma^\mu$, then the fermion propagator with momentum $p-k$, then vertex $v_2$ contributes $\gamma^\nu$, then the fermion propagator with momentum $p-k-l$, then vertex $v_3$ contributes $\gamma_\nu$, then the fermion propagator with momentum $p-k$ again, then vertex $v_4$ contributes $\gamma_\mu$. The two photon propagators contribute $1/k^2$ (outer) and $1/l^2$ (inner). There are five propagator denominators in total: two fermion propagators with momentum $p-k$, one fermion propagator with momentum $p-k-l$, and two photon propagators $1/k^2$ (outer) and $1/l^2$ (inner). Of these, two depend on $l$: the middle fermion propagator $(p-k-l)^2-m^2$ and the inner photon $l^2$.
The subdivergence: the inner loop
$$\Sigma_{\text{inner}}(p-k) = -e^2\int\frac{d^dl}{(2\pi)^d}\;\gamma^\nu\,\frac{\not{p}-\not{k}-\not{l}+m}{(p-k-l)^2-m^2}\,\gamma_\nu\;\frac{1}{l^2}$$
Hold the outer momentum $k$ fixed and examine the $l$-integration over vertices $v_2$ and $v_3$ alone. This is exactly the one-loop electron self-energy $\Sigma^{(1)}$ evaluated at external momentum $p-k$. By power counting it diverges as $\sim 1/\epsilon$ in $d = 4-2\epsilon$ dimensions. This is a subdivergence: the full two-loop integral is ill-defined even before we consider the $k$-integration, because the $l$-integral already diverges independently.
BPHZ renormalization: subtracting the subdivergence
$$R\,\Sigma_{\text{nest}} = \Sigma_{\text{nest}} + \Sigma_{\text{ct-insert}} - \delta_{\text{overall}}(\Sigma_{\text{nest}} + \Sigma_{\text{ct-insert}})$$
Zimmermann's forest formula instructs us to handle divergences from the inside out. First, subtract the subdivergence by adding a counterterm-insertion diagram (next step). The combination $\Sigma_{\text{nest}} + \Sigma_{\text{ct-insert}}$ is free of subdivergences but still has an overall $1/\epsilon$ pole from the remaining $k$-integration. A final overall subtraction removes this, leaving a finite renormalized result. The nested diagram has four forests: $\varnothing$ (the empty forest, corresponding to the unsubtracted diagram), $\{\gamma_{\text{inner}}\}$ (the subdivergence alone), $\{\Gamma\}$ (the overall diagram alone), and $\{\gamma_{\text{inner}}, \Gamma\}$ (the subdivergence plus the full diagram). The forest formula sums over all four, and Zimmermann's theorem guarantees the result is finite.
The counterterm-insertion diagram
$$-i\Sigma_{\text{ct-insert}}(p) = -e^2\int\frac{d^dk}{(2\pi)^d}\;\gamma^\mu\,\frac{\not{p}-\not{k}+m}{(p-k)^2-m^2}\;\Big[-i\,\delta\Sigma^{(1)}(p-k)\Big]\;\frac{\not{p}-\not{k}+m}{(p-k)^2-m^2}\;\gamma_\mu\;\frac{1}{k^2}$$
Replace the inner one-loop self-energy subdiagram with its counterterm $\delta\Sigma^{(1)} = -(\delta_1 Z_2\,(\not{p}-\not{k}) - \delta_1 m)$, where $\delta_1 Z_2$ and $\delta_1 m$ are the one-loop renormalization constants. This is a one-loop diagram (only the $k$-integration remains) with a counterterm vertex $\otimes$ inserted on the fermion line between $v_2$ and $v_3$. By construction, adding this diagram to $\Sigma_{\text{nest}}$ cancels the $1/\epsilon$ pole from the $l$-integration — the subdivergence is gone. What remains is a one-loop integral in $k$ with at most a single overall $1/\epsilon$ divergence.
The overall divergence and final subtraction
$$\Sigma_{\text{nest}}(p) + \Sigma_{\text{ct-insert}}(p) = \frac{\alpha^2}{(4\pi)^2}\left[\frac{A_2\,m + B_2\,\not{p}}{\epsilon} + \text{finite}\right]$$
After combining the bare nested diagram with the counterterm-insertion diagram, the result has no $1/\epsilon^2$ poles (those cancelled between the two diagrams) but retains a single $1/\epsilon$ pole from the overall $k$-integration. This overall divergence is absorbed by the two-loop contributions to the mass and field-strength counterterms $\delta_2 m$ and $\delta_2 Z_2$. The cancellation of the double pole $1/\epsilon^2$ is a non-trivial consistency check: it confirms that the subdivergence was correctly identified and subtracted.
The renormalized contribution
$$\Sigma_{\text{nest}}^{\text{ren}}(p) = \frac{\alpha^2}{(4\pi)^2}\Big[c_1\,m + c_2\,\not{p} + c_3\,m\ln\!\frac{m^2}{\mu^2} + c_4\,\not{p}\ln\!\frac{m^2}{\mu^2} + c_5\,m\ln^2\!\frac{m^2}{\mu^2} + \cdots\Big]$$
The fully renormalized nested self-energy is finite and scheme-dependent. Its structure is fixed by Lorentz covariance: $\Sigma^{\text{ren}} = A(p^2) + B(p^2)\not{p}$, with $A$ and $B$ containing $\ln(m^2/\mu^2)$ terms from the renormalization scale $\mu$. The appearance of $\ln^2$ terms (double logarithms) is characteristic of two-loop diagrams with nested subdivergences — they arise from the interplay between the subtracted subdivergence and the overall integration. This diagram, together with the overlapping and vacuum-polarization-insertion topologies, makes up the full $O(\alpha^2)$ correction to the electron propagator.